 |
|
|
|
|
| Added: Tue, Apr 24th 2001 13:28 UTC (7 years, 5 months ago) |
Updated: Wed, Feb 13th 2008 06:30 UTC (7 months, 27 days ago) |
|
|
About:
Linphone is an audio and video Internet phone with
GTK+, console, and Win32 interfaces. It uses the
SIP protocol, and is compatible with most SIP
clients and gateways. It uses various audio and
video codecs such as Speex, GSM, G711, ilbc,
Theora, H263-1998, MPEG4, and snow.
Release focus: Minor bugfixes
Changes:
This version fixes an interoperability bug with
Asterisk servers in which linphone did not
properly terminate calls. It also fixes ALSA
support by checking capture underruns.
Author:
Simon Morlat <simon |dot| morlat |at| linphone |dot| org>
[contact developer]
Homepage:
http://www.linphone.org
Tar/GZ:
http://www.linphone.org/index.php/eng/download
RPM package:
http://www.linphone.org/index.php/eng/download
Debian package:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/sound/linphone
CVS tree (cvsweb):
http://savanah.gnu.org/projects/linphone
Trove categories:
[change]
Dependencies:
[change]
The GNU oSIP Stack 0.9.7 (required)
[download links]
|
|
» Rating:
8.50/10.00
(Rank N/A)
» Vitality: 0.15% (Rank 1280)
» Popularity: 6.86% (Rank 438)
 
(click to enlarge graphs)
Record hits: 68,719
URL hits: 48,024
Subscribers: 152
|
|
Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
2.1.1
|
Minor bugfixes |
13-Feb-2008 14:30 |
|
2.1.0
|
Minor feature enhancements |
29-Jan-2008 18:46 |
|
2.0.1
|
Major bugfixes |
30-Nov-2007 15:00 |
|
2.0.0
|
Major feature enhancements |
20-Nov-2007 22:00 |
|
1.7.1
|
Minor bugfixes |
16-Apr-2007 21:02 |
|
1.7.0
|
Minor feature enhancements |
11-Apr-2007 17:34 |
|
1.6.0
|
Minor feature enhancements |
23-Jan-2007 14:31 |
|
1.5.1
|
Minor bugfixes |
14-Nov-2006 16:04 |
|
1.5.0
|
Major feature enhancements |
11-Oct-2006 11:58 |
|
1.4.1
|
Major bugfixes |
19-Sep-2006 16:16 |
Articles referencing this project
Comments
[»]
Error message: "Invalid authentication attempt"
by IT Blogger - Sep 23rd 2007 05:57:40
Great application! Wote 10 for this project. But... I can't install the
program on Windows XP. The system shows me the error message: "Invalid
authentication attempt". On Linux runs without any problems!
--
Hardcore ASP & ASP.NET coding. Copywriting, Translation, Internet marketing services.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
WEB ? Phone
by Atif Ghaffar - Oct 30th 2001 10:15:03
why is it called web phone? Does it rely on any HTTP
protocol/service?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: WEB ? Phone
by Simon Morlat - Oct 30th 2001 13:44:45
> why is it called web phone? Does it rely
> on any HTTP
> protocol/service?
>
Linphone uses the Session Initiation Protocol (rfc
2543), and Real Time Protcol (rfc 1889). Http is
inadequat. I agree that "internet phone" is better than
"web phone".
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: WEB ? Phone
by Atif Ghaffar - Oct 31st 2001 09:08:42
> I agree that "internet
> phone" is better than
> "web phone".
>
Its not the matter of a better term.
"Webphone" is simply incorrect as it has nothing to do with the
web.
More and more people have started to use the term "Web" when they mean
"Internet".
For most of us the term "web" refers to HTTP.
Agreed that the web is a major part of the Internet but it definitely not
the internet.
Thankyou for understanding.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: WEB ? Phone
by Simon Morlat - Oct 31st 2001 18:51:37
This is exaclty what I've understood.
I will change the presentaion lines on freshmeat one
of these days.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: WEB ? Phone
by jbo - Nov 5th 2001 10:10:44
% "Webphone" is simply incorrect as it
> has nothing to do with the web.
> More and more people have started to
> use the term "Web" when they mean
> "Internet". For most of us the term
> "web" refers to HTTP.
>
> Agreed that the web is a major part of
> the Internet but it definitely not the
> internet.
Basically, SIP and RTP are only two of the numerous protocols relying upon
IP. So 'internet phone' would be adequate.
However, SIP is an HTTP-like protocol. This means that SIP messages look
very much like HTTP messages. Incidentally, SIP addresses (the address at
which an individual could be reached, btw, I should say SIP URI) look like
http addresses, eg :
sip:duponddupont@moulinsart.com
or
sip:0123456789@france-telecom.com
SIP applications and devices exist already. The next expected step is to
integrate SIP devices in the home network, so that SIP adresses could be
transmitted in e-mail or on web pages, and a browser click on the adress
would activate the SIP device (or PC conferencing application), just as a
click on a sound file nowadays runs the media reader.
So, hopefully, this application WILL become a webphone, without any
modification since the evolution is then in the browser and network
management...
just to bring in some argumentation
[reply]
[top]
[»]
How do i get
by VINOD KUMAR G - Aug 18th 2006 07:39:21
Respected Sir how do i doenload and run the project
My name is Vinod Working as VoIP tester
Thanks in advance
Vinod kumar G
> % "Webphone" is simply incorrect as it
> % has nothing to do with the web.
> % More and more people have started to
> % use the term "Web" when they mean
> % "Internet". For most of us the term
> % "web" refers to HTTP.
> %
> % Agreed that the web is a major part
> of
> % the Internet but it definitely not
> the
> % internet.
>
>
> Basically, SIP and RTP are only two of
> the numerous protocols relying upon IP.
> So 'internet phone' would be adequate.
>
> However, SIP is an HTTP-like protocol.
> This means that SIP messages look very
> much like HTTP messages. Incidentally,
> SIP addresses (the address at which an
> individual could be reached, btw, I
> should say SIP URI) look like http
> addresses, eg :
> sip:duponddupont@moulinsart.com
> or
> sip:0123456789@france-telecom.com
>
> SIP applications and devices exist
> already. The next expected step is to
> integrate SIP devices in the home
> network, so that SIP adresses could be
> transmitted in e-mail or on web pages,
> and a browser click on the adress would
> activate the SIP device (or PC
> conferencing application), just as a
> click on a sound file nowadays runs the
> media reader.
>
> So, hopefully, this application WILL
> become a webphone, without any
> modification since the evolution is then
> in the browser and network
> management...
>
> just to bring in some argumentation
[reply]
[top]
|
|
|
