[»]
Re: WEB ? Phone
by Simon Morlat - Oct 31st 2001 18:51:37
This is exaclty what I've understood.
I will change the presentaion lines on freshmeat one
of these days.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: WEB ? Phone
by jbo - Nov 5th 2001 10:10:44
% "Webphone" is simply incorrect as it
> has nothing to do with the web.
> More and more people have started to
> use the term "Web" when they mean
> "Internet". For most of us the term
> "web" refers to HTTP.
>
> Agreed that the web is a major part of
> the Internet but it definitely not the
> internet.
Basically, SIP and RTP are only two of the numerous protocols relying upon
IP. So 'internet phone' would be adequate.
However, SIP is an HTTP-like protocol. This means that SIP messages look
very much like HTTP messages. Incidentally, SIP addresses (the address at
which an individual could be reached, btw, I should say SIP URI) look like
http addresses, eg :
sip:duponddupont@moulinsart.com
or
sip:0123456789@france-telecom.com
SIP applications and devices exist already. The next expected step is to
integrate SIP devices in the home network, so that SIP adresses could be
transmitted in e-mail or on web pages, and a browser click on the adress
would activate the SIP device (or PC conferencing application), just as a
click on a sound file nowadays runs the media reader.
So, hopefully, this application WILL become a webphone, without any
modification since the evolution is then in the browser and network
management...
just to bring in some argumentation
[reply]
[top]
[»]
How do i get
by VINOD KUMAR G - Aug 18th 2006 07:39:21
Respected Sir how do i doenload and run the project
My name is Vinod Working as VoIP tester
Thanks in advance
Vinod kumar G
> % "Webphone" is simply incorrect as it
> % has nothing to do with the web.
> % More and more people have started to
> % use the term "Web" when they mean
> % "Internet". For most of us the term
> % "web" refers to HTTP.
> %
> % Agreed that the web is a major part
> of
> % the Internet but it definitely not
> the
> % internet.
>
>
> Basically, SIP and RTP are only two of
> the numerous protocols relying upon IP.
> So 'internet phone' would be adequate.
>
> However, SIP is an HTTP-like protocol.
> This means that SIP messages look very
> much like HTTP messages. Incidentally,
> SIP addresses (the address at which an
> individual could be reached, btw, I
> should say SIP URI) look like http
> addresses, eg :
> sip:duponddupont@moulinsart.com
> or
> sip:0123456789@france-telecom.com
>
> SIP applications and devices exist
> already. The next expected step is to
> integrate SIP devices in the home
> network, so that SIP adresses could be
> transmitted in e-mail or on web pages,
> and a browser click on the adress would
> activate the SIP device (or PC
> conferencing application), just as a
> click on a sound file nowadays runs the
> media reader.
>
> So, hopefully, this application WILL
> become a webphone, without any
> modification since the evolution is then
> in the browser and network
> management...
>
> just to bring in some argumentation
[reply]
[top]
